Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
Nutrient Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 115 kcal 90 kcal Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 28% more
Protein 5.07 g 2.01 g Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 152% more
Carbs 24.38 g 20.71 g Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 18% more
Fat 0.8 g 0.15 g Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 433% more
Fiber 4.5 g 3.3 g Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 36% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 17 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more
Calcium 17 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more
Iron 1.52 mg 0.69 mg Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 120% more
Vitamin C 8.2 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more
Potassium 410 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.