Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 93 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 23% more |
| Protein | 4.31 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 2% more |
| Carbs | 19.95 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Fat | 0.89 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Fiber | 4.1 g ★ | 2.8 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 46% more |
| Sugar | 2.21 g | 0.87 g ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 154% more |
| Sodium | 281 mg | 7 mg ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 3914% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.89 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 40% more |
| Vitamin C | 5.9 mg ★ | 0 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 265 mg ★ | 172 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.