Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, unprepared vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, unprepared
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, unprepared | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 93 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 23% more |
| Protein | 4.31 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 2% more |
| Carbs | 19.94 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Fat | 0.89 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Fiber | 4 g ★ | 2.8 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, unprepared has 43% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 45 mg | 7 mg ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, unprepared has 543% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Iron | 0.94 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 37% more |
| Vitamin C | 8.5 mg ★ | 0 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, unprepared has 0% more |
| Potassium | 295 mg ★ | 172 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), frozen, unprepared has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.