Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 90 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 25% more |
| Protein | 2.01 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Carbs | 20.71 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 3% more |
| Fat | 0.15 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 92% more |
| Fiber | 3.3 g ★ | 2.8 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Sugar | 6.48 g | 0.87 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 645% more |
| Sodium | 36 mg | 7 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 414% more |
| Calcium | 38 mg ★ | 17 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 124% more |
| Iron | 0.69 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Vitamin C | 19.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 475 mg ★ | 172 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 176% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.