Syrups, maple vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Syrups, maple
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Syrups, maple | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 260 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Syrups, maple has 189% more |
| Protein | 0.04 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Carbs | 67.04 g ★ | 20.71 g | Syrups, maple has 224% more |
| Fat | 0.06 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 60.46 g | 6.48 g ★ | Syrups, maple has 833% more |
| Sodium | 12 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Calcium | 102 mg ★ | 38 mg | Syrups, maple has 168% more |
| Iron | 0.11 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 212 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.