Tamarinds, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tamarinds, raw
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Tamarinds, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Tamarinds, raw has 166% more |
| Protein | 2.8 g ★ | 2.01 g | Tamarinds, raw has 39% more |
| Carbs | 62.5 g ★ | 20.71 g | Tamarinds, raw has 202% more |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.15 g ★ | Tamarinds, raw has 300% more |
| Fiber | 5.1 g ★ | 3.3 g | Tamarinds, raw has 55% more |
| Sugar | 38.8 g | 6.48 g ★ | Tamarinds, raw has 499% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
| Calcium | 74 mg ★ | 38 mg | Tamarinds, raw has 95% more |
| Iron | 2.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Tamarinds, raw has 306% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Potassium | 628 mg ★ | 475 mg | Tamarinds, raw has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.