Taro, cooked, with salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro, cooked, with salt
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Taro, cooked, with salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Taro, cooked, with salt has 18% more |
| Protein | 0.52 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Carbs | 34.6 g ★ | 21.3 g | Taro, cooked, with salt has 62% more |
| Fat | 0.11 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
| Fiber | 5.1 g ★ | 2.8 g | Taro, cooked, with salt has 82% more |
| Sugar | 0.49 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 44% more |
| Sodium | 251 mg | 7 mg ★ | Taro, cooked, with salt has 3486% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 17 mg | Taro, cooked, with salt has 6% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 52% more |
| Vitamin C | 5 mg ★ | 0 mg | Taro, cooked, with salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 484 mg ★ | 172 mg | Taro, cooked, with salt has 181% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.