Taro, cooked, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro, cooked, with salt
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Taro, cooked, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Taro, cooked, with salt has 58% more |
| Protein | 0.52 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Carbs | 34.6 g ★ | 20.71 g | Taro, cooked, with salt has 67% more |
| Fat | 0.11 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Fiber | 5.1 g ★ | 3.3 g | Taro, cooked, with salt has 55% more |
| Sugar | 0.49 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Sodium | 251 mg | 36 mg ★ | Taro, cooked, with salt has 597% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Taro, cooked, with salt has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Potassium | 484 mg ★ | 475 mg | Taro, cooked, with salt has 2% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.