Taro, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Taro, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 112 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Taro, raw has 24% more |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
| Carbs | 26.46 g ★ | 20.71 g | Taro, raw has 28% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Taro, raw has 33% more |
| Fiber | 4.1 g ★ | 3.3 g | Taro, raw has 24% more |
| Sugar | 0.4 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 43 mg ★ | 38 mg | Taro, raw has 13% more |
| Iron | 0.55 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Potassium | 591 mg ★ | 475 mg | Taro, raw has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.