Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 44 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 63% more |
| Protein | 4.16 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
| Carbs | 6.85 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 68% more |
| Fat | 0.68 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 290 mg | 7 mg ★ | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 4043% more |
| Calcium | 149 mg ★ | 17 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 776% more |
| Iron | 1.56 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 5% more |
| Vitamin C | 38 mg ★ | 0 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 623 mg ★ | 172 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 262% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.