Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 44 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
| Protein | 4.16 g ★ | 2.01 g | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 107% more |
| Carbs | 6.85 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fat | 0.68 g | 0.15 g ★ | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 353% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 290 mg | 36 mg ★ | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 706% more |
| Calcium | 149 mg ★ | 38 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 292% more |
| Iron | 1.56 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 126% more |
| Vitamin C | 38 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 94% more |
| Potassium | 623 mg ★ | 475 mg | Taro, tahitian, cooked, with salt has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.