Taro, tahitian, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro, tahitian, raw
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Taro, tahitian, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 44 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 63% more |
| Protein | 2.79 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 37% more |
| Carbs | 6.91 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 68% more |
| Fat | 0.97 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 49% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg | 7 mg ★ | Taro, tahitian, raw has 614% more |
| Calcium | 129 mg ★ | 17 mg | Taro, tahitian, raw has 659% more |
| Iron | 1.3 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 13% more |
| Vitamin C | 96 mg ★ | 0 mg | Taro, tahitian, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 606 mg ★ | 172 mg | Taro, tahitian, raw has 252% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.