Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 270 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate has 125% more |
| Protein | 18.82 g ★ | 4.4 g | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate has 328% more |
| Carbs | 8.86 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
| Fat | 20.18 g | 1.92 g ★ | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate has 951% more |
| Fiber | 3.9 g ★ | 2.8 g | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate has 39% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 16 mg | 7 mg ★ | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate has 129% more |
| Calcium | 961 mg ★ | 17 mg | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate has 5553% more |
| Iron | 4.87 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Tofu, fried, prepared with calcium sulfate has 227% more |
| Potassium | 146 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.