Tomatoes, crushed, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tomatoes, crushed, canned
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Tomatoes, crushed, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 32 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Protein | 1.64 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Carbs | 7.29 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Fat | 0.28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Tomatoes, crushed, canned has 87% more |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Sugar | 4.4 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Sodium | 186 mg | 36 mg ★ | Tomatoes, crushed, canned has 417% more |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Iron | 1.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Tomatoes, crushed, canned has 88% more |
| Vitamin C | 9.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Potassium | 293 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.