Tomatoes, red, ripe, canned, with green chilies vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tomatoes, red, ripe, canned, with green chilies
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Tomatoes, red, ripe, canned, with green chilies | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Protein | 0.69 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Carbs | 3.62 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Fat | 0.08 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 401 mg | 36 mg ★ | Tomatoes, red, ripe, canned, with green chilies has 1014% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Iron | 0.26 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Vitamin C | 6.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.