Tree fern, cooked, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tree fern, cooked, without salt
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Tree fern, cooked, without salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 40 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Protein | 0.29 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Carbs | 10.98 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Fat | 0.07 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Fiber | 3.7 g ★ | 3.3 g | Tree fern, cooked, without salt has 12% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.16 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Vitamin C | 30 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Tree fern, cooked, without salt has 53% more |
| Potassium | 5 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.