Triticale flour, whole-grain vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Triticale flour, whole-grain
9 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
1 wins
| Nutrient | Triticale flour, whole-grain | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 338 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 182% more |
| Protein | 13.18 g ★ | 4.4 g | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 200% more |
| Carbs | 73.14 g ★ | 21.3 g | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 243% more |
| Fat | 1.81 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Fiber | 14.6 g ★ | 2.8 g | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 421% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Calcium | 35 mg ★ | 17 mg | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 106% more |
| Iron | 2.59 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 74% more |
| Potassium | 466 mg ★ | 172 mg | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 171% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.