Triticale flour, whole-grain vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Triticale flour, whole-grain
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Triticale flour, whole-grain | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 338 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 276% more |
| Protein | 13.18 g ★ | 2.01 g | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 556% more |
| Carbs | 73.14 g ★ | 20.71 g | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 253% more |
| Fat | 1.81 g | 0.15 g ★ | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 1107% more |
| Fiber | 14.6 g ★ | 3.3 g | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 342% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 35 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
| Iron | 2.59 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Triticale flour, whole-grain has 275% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 466 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 2% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.