Vegetarian fillets vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Vegetarian fillets
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Vegetarian fillets | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 290 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Vegetarian fillets has 222% more |
| Protein | 23 g ★ | 2.01 g | Vegetarian fillets has 1044% more |
| Carbs | 9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Fat | 18 g | 0.15 g ★ | Vegetarian fillets has 11900% more |
| Fiber | 6.1 g ★ | 3.3 g | Vegetarian fillets has 85% more |
| Sugar | 0.8 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sodium | 490 mg | 36 mg ★ | Vegetarian fillets has 1261% more |
| Calcium | 95 mg ★ | 38 mg | Vegetarian fillets has 150% more |
| Iron | 2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Vegetarian fillets has 190% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 600 mg ★ | 475 mg | Vegetarian fillets has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.