Vital wheat gluten vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Vital wheat gluten
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Vital wheat gluten | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 370 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Vital wheat gluten has 311% more |
| Protein | 75.16 g ★ | 2.01 g | Vital wheat gluten has 3639% more |
| Carbs | 13.79 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fat | 1.85 g | 0.15 g ★ | Vital wheat gluten has 1133% more |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 29 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Calcium | 142 mg ★ | 38 mg | Vital wheat gluten has 274% more |
| Iron | 5.2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Vital wheat gluten has 654% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 100 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.