Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 362% more |
| Protein | 16.3 g ★ | 3.15 g | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 417% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 24.1 g | 3.25 g ★ | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 642% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 43 mg | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Iron | 9.4 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Walrus, meat and subcutaneous fat raw (Alaska Native) has 31233% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 132 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.