Watercress, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Watercress, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Watercress, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 11 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Protein | 2.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Watercress, raw has 14% more |
| Carbs | 1.29 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sugar | 0.2 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg | 36 mg ★ | Watercress, raw has 14% more |
| Calcium | 120 mg ★ | 38 mg | Watercress, raw has 216% more |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Vitamin C | 43 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Watercress, raw has 119% more |
| Potassium | 330 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.