Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 362 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched has 302% more |
| Protein | 8.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched has 308% more |
| Carbs | 78.03 g ★ | 20.71 g | Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched has 277% more |
| Fat | 0.86 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched has 473% more |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 0.31 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 7.32 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wheat flour, white, cake, enriched has 961% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 105 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.