Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 337 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 181% more |
| Protein | 14.54 g ★ | 4.4 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 230% more |
| Carbs | 70.58 g ★ | 21.3 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 231% more |
| Fat | 2.13 g | 1.92 g ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 11% more |
| Fiber | 11.1 g ★ | 2.8 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 296% more |
| Sugar | 7.84 g | 0.87 g ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 801% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg ★ | 17 mg | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 3.77 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 153% more |
| Potassium | 403 mg ★ | 172 mg | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 134% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.