Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 337 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 274% more |
| Protein | 14.54 g ★ | 2.01 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 623% more |
| Carbs | 70.58 g ★ | 20.71 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 241% more |
| Fat | 2.13 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 1320% more |
| Fiber | 11.1 g ★ | 3.3 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 236% more |
| Sugar | 7.84 g | 6.48 g ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 21% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 3.77 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, uncooked has 446% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 403 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.