Winged bean tuber, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Winged bean tuber, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Winged bean tuber, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 148 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Winged bean tuber, raw has 64% more |
| Protein | 11.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Winged bean tuber, raw has 477% more |
| Carbs | 28.1 g ★ | 20.71 g | Winged bean tuber, raw has 36% more |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Winged bean tuber, raw has 500% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 35 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Calcium | 30 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Iron | 2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Winged bean tuber, raw has 190% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 586 mg ★ | 475 mg | Winged bean tuber, raw has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.