Amaranth grain, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Amaranth grain, cooked
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Amaranth grain, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 102 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Amaranth grain, cooked has 13% more |
| Protein | 3.8 g ★ | 2.01 g | Amaranth grain, cooked has 89% more |
| Carbs | 18.69 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Fat | 1.58 g | 0.15 g ★ | Amaranth grain, cooked has 953% more |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 6 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Calcium | 47 mg ★ | 38 mg | Amaranth grain, cooked has 24% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Amaranth grain, cooked has 204% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 135 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.