APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 356 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings has 296% more |
| Protein | 4.58 g ★ | 2.01 g | APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings has 128% more |
| Carbs | 40.17 g ★ | 20.71 g | APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings has 94% more |
| Fat | 19.61 g | 0.15 g ★ | APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings has 12973% more |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Sugar | 4.48 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
| Sodium | 833 mg | 36 mg ★ | APPLEBEE'S, crunchy onion rings has 2214% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.67 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 135 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.