Bologna, beef and pork, low fat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, beef and pork, low fat
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 92% more |
| Protein | 11.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 161% more |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 1.92 g ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 905% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1108 mg | 7 mg ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 15729% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 0.66 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
| Potassium | 156 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 9% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.