Bologna, beef and pork, low fat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, beef and pork, low fat
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 156% more |
| Protein | 11.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 472% more |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 12767% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1108 mg | 36 mg ★ | Bologna, beef and pork, low fat has 2978% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.66 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 156 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.