Bologna, pork and turkey, lite vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bologna, pork and turkey, lite
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Bologna, pork and turkey, lite | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Bologna, pork and turkey, lite has 134% more |
| Protein | 13.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bologna, pork and turkey, lite has 550% more |
| Carbs | 3.45 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Fat | 16.06 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bologna, pork and turkey, lite has 10607% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 716 mg | 36 mg ★ | Bologna, pork and turkey, lite has 1889% more |
| Calcium | 48 mg ★ | 38 mg | Bologna, pork and turkey, lite has 26% more |
| Iron | 1.15 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Bologna, pork and turkey, lite has 67% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 138 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.