Crackers, rusk toast vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Crackers, rusk toast
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Crackers, rusk toast | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 407 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Crackers, rusk toast has 239% more |
| Protein | 13.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Crackers, rusk toast has 207% more |
| Carbs | 72.3 g ★ | 21.3 g | Crackers, rusk toast has 239% more |
| Fat | 7.2 g | 1.92 g ★ | Crackers, rusk toast has 275% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 253 mg | 7 mg ★ | Crackers, rusk toast has 3514% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg ★ | 17 mg | Crackers, rusk toast has 59% more |
| Iron | 2.72 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Crackers, rusk toast has 83% more |
| Potassium | 245 mg ★ | 172 mg | Crackers, rusk toast has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.