Crackers, rusk toast vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Crackers, rusk toast
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Crackers, rusk toast | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 407 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Crackers, rusk toast has 352% more |
| Protein | 13.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Crackers, rusk toast has 572% more |
| Carbs | 72.3 g ★ | 20.71 g | Crackers, rusk toast has 249% more |
| Fat | 7.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Crackers, rusk toast has 4700% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 253 mg | 36 mg ★ | Crackers, rusk toast has 603% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more |
| Iron | 2.72 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Crackers, rusk toast has 294% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 245 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.