Currants, red and white, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Currants, red and white, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Currants, red and white, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 56 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 38% more |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Carbs | 13.8 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Currants, red and white, raw has 33% more |
| Fiber | 4.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Currants, red and white, raw has 30% more |
| Sugar | 7.37 g | 6.48 g ★ | Currants, red and white, raw has 14% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 33 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Iron | 1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Currants, red and white, raw has 45% more |
| Vitamin C | 41 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Currants, red and white, raw has 109% more |
| Potassium | 275 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.