Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham has 159% more |
| Protein | 10.64 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham has 429% more |
| Carbs | 16.37 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Fat | 14.08 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham has 9287% more |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sugar | 2.2 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Sodium | 1093 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham has 2936% more |
| Calcium | 115 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham has 203% more |
| Iron | 2.37 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fast foods, biscuit, with egg and ham has 243% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 166 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.