Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 221 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried has 84% more |
| Protein | 18.2 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried has 314% more |
| Carbs | 7.54 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Fat | 12.67 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried has 560% more |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 86% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 348 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried has 4871% more |
| Calcium | 32 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried has 88% more |
| Iron | 0.86 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 42% more |
| Potassium | 340 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried has 98% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.