Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 204 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat has 70% more |
| Protein | 28.62 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat has 550% more |
| Carbs | 1.92 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 91% more |
| Fat | 8.23 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat has 329% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 117 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat has 1571% more |
| Calcium | 28 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat has 65% more |
| Iron | 0.77 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 48% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 283 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, roe, mixed species, cooked, dry heat has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.