Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
Nutrient Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 433 kcal 90 kcal Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat has 381% more
Protein 1.5 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more
Carbs 52.7 g 20.71 g Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat has 154% more
Fat 24 g 0.15 g Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat has 15900% more
Fiber 2.5 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more
Sugar 40 g 6.48 g Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat has 517% more
Sodium 160 mg 36 mg Frostings, coconut-nut, ready-to-eat has 344% more
Calcium 13 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more
Iron 0.54 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more
Vitamin C 0.2 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more
Potassium 186 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.