Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians)
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 628 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 598% more |
| Protein | 14.89 g ★ | 2.01 g | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 641% more |
| Carbs | 22.98 g ★ | 20.71 g | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 11% more |
| Fat | 52.99 g | 0.15 g ★ | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 35227% more |
| Fiber | 9.8 g ★ | 3.3 g | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 197% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 441 mg ★ | 38 mg | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 1061% more |
| Iron | 3.12 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 352% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 738 mg ★ | 475 mg | Hazelnuts, beaked (Northern Plains Indians) has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.