Hearts of palm, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Hearts of palm, canned
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Hearts of palm, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 28 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Protein | 2.52 g ★ | 2.01 g | Hearts of palm, canned has 25% more |
| Carbs | 4.62 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Fat | 0.62 g | 0.15 g ★ | Hearts of palm, canned has 313% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 426 mg | 36 mg ★ | Hearts of palm, canned has 1083% more |
| Calcium | 58 mg ★ | 38 mg | Hearts of palm, canned has 53% more |
| Iron | 3.13 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Hearts of palm, canned has 354% more |
| Vitamin C | 7.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Potassium | 177 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.