LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 156% more |
| Protein | 10.28 g ★ | 2.01 g | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 411% more |
| Carbs | 32.52 g ★ | 20.71 g | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 57% more |
| Fat | 6.53 g | 0.15 g ★ | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 4253% more |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 7.6 g | 6.48 g ★ | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 17% more |
| Sodium | 423 mg | 36 mg ★ | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 1075% more |
| Calcium | 196 mg ★ | 38 mg | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 416% more |
| Iron | 2.15 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | LEAN POCKETS, Ham N Cheddar has 212% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 203 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.