Millet, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Millet, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Millet, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Millet, cooked has 32% more |
| Protein | 3.51 g ★ | 2.01 g | Millet, cooked has 75% more |
| Carbs | 23.67 g ★ | 20.71 g | Millet, cooked has 14% more |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.15 g ★ | Millet, cooked has 567% more |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 0.13 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 0.63 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 62 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.