Millet, puffed vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Millet, puffed
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Millet, puffed | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 354 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Millet, puffed has 293% more |
| Protein | 13 g ★ | 2.01 g | Millet, puffed has 547% more |
| Carbs | 80 g ★ | 20.71 g | Millet, puffed has 286% more |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Millet, puffed has 2167% more |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Sugar | 0.55 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 2.81 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Millet, puffed has 307% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 40 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.