Millet, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Millet, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Millet, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Millet, raw has 320% more |
| Protein | 11.02 g ★ | 2.01 g | Millet, raw has 448% more |
| Carbs | 72.85 g ★ | 20.71 g | Millet, raw has 252% more |
| Fat | 4.22 g | 0.15 g ★ | Millet, raw has 2713% more |
| Fiber | 8.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Millet, raw has 158% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 3.01 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Millet, raw has 336% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 195 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.