Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 629 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched has 599% more |
| Protein | 13.7 g ★ | 2.01 g | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched has 582% more |
| Carbs | 17 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Fat | 61.15 g | 0.15 g ★ | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched has 40667% more |
| Fiber | 11 g ★ | 3.3 g | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched has 233% more |
| Sugar | 3.49 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 149 mg ★ | 38 mg | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched has 292% more |
| Iron | 3.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched has 378% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Potassium | 658 mg ★ | 475 mg | Nuts, hazelnuts or filberts, blanched has 39% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.