Oat bran, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oat bran, cooked
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Oat bran, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 40 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Protein | 3.21 g ★ | 2.01 g | Oat bran, cooked has 60% more |
| Carbs | 11.44 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Fat | 0.86 g | 0.15 g ★ | Oat bran, cooked has 473% more |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 0.88 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Oat bran, cooked has 28% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 92 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.