Oat flour, partially debranned vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oat flour, partially debranned
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Oat flour, partially debranned | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 404 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 237% more |
| Protein | 14.66 g ★ | 4.4 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 233% more |
| Carbs | 65.7 g ★ | 21.3 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 208% more |
| Fat | 9.12 g | 1.92 g ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 375% more |
| Fiber | 6.5 g ★ | 2.8 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 132% more |
| Sugar | 0.8 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 8% more |
| Sodium | 19 mg | 7 mg ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 171% more |
| Calcium | 55 mg ★ | 17 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 224% more |
| Iron | 4 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 168% more |
| Potassium | 371 mg ★ | 172 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 116% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.