Oat flour, partially debranned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oat flour, partially debranned
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Oat flour, partially debranned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 404 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 349% more |
| Protein | 14.66 g ★ | 2.01 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 629% more |
| Carbs | 65.7 g ★ | 20.71 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 217% more |
| Fat | 9.12 g | 0.15 g ★ | Oat flour, partially debranned has 5980% more |
| Fiber | 6.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Oat flour, partially debranned has 97% more |
| Sugar | 0.8 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sodium | 19 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Calcium | 55 mg ★ | 38 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 45% more |
| Iron | 4 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Oat flour, partially debranned has 480% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 371 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.