Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
Nutrient Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 152 kcal 90 kcal Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST has 69% more
Protein 3.23 g 2.01 g Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST has 61% more
Carbs 31.11 g 20.71 g Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST has 50% more
Fat 2.07 g 0.15 g Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST has 1280% more
Fiber 3.3 g 3.3 g Equal
Sugar 0.3 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more
Sodium 4 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more
Calcium 7 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more
Iron 0.72 mg 0.69 mg Pasta, gluten-free, corn flour and quinoa flour, cooked, ANCIENT HARVEST has 4% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 63 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.