Peanut flour, low fat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Peanut flour, low fat
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Peanut flour, low fat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 428 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Peanut flour, low fat has 376% more |
| Protein | 33.8 g ★ | 2.01 g | Peanut flour, low fat has 1582% more |
| Carbs | 31.27 g ★ | 20.71 g | Peanut flour, low fat has 51% more |
| Fat | 21.9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Peanut flour, low fat has 14500% more |
| Fiber | 15.8 g ★ | 3.3 g | Peanut flour, low fat has 379% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 130 mg ★ | 38 mg | Peanut flour, low fat has 242% more |
| Iron | 4.74 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Peanut flour, low fat has 587% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 1358 mg ★ | 475 mg | Peanut flour, low fat has 186% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.